Tickets were expensive for the experience

It was rather short, and just a bunch of fancy lights -- many of the exhibhits were broken or non interactive. Some of the things were cool, but it wasn't $30 cool. The gardner museum is vastly superior, for example, at $20, or the science museum. Most of the things were on the lame side, like a machine that gives out positive feedback? I can get that anywhere on the internet. A poorly made make your own music machine? I can ask an AI to make a song that I like for more easily and fraction of the cost.

It was ok. Not sure what I was expecting but it felt a little thrown together.

I was expecting a more immersive experience, like a smaller version of the teamLab museums in Tokyo. What we experienced was more child-oriented and, rather than spending time exploring a space, we queued of for a few specific exhibits, each of which was exhausted within a few minutes. The first exhibit, involving sound, seemed not to be working. The iris exhibit, which was one of the more interesting ones for adults, had a long queue and took much too long per person (the person running it obviously needed to do far too much manual work after each picture was taken). On the whole, I found the museum to be someone fun (and would've been even better if I had a young child in tow), but too expensive for what it is.

pretty short / underwhelming exhibit for the price

Felt more like an exhibition for art students. Very short experience and not that interesting.

Very bad experience inside the museum not fun I am not recommending to everyone don’t go with families because spend money don’t worth it .

The entire experience was very short for the cost of the tickets. For three people it cost more than $100 for less than 45 mins. The majority of exhibits were not very interactive and lacked true engagement.